Approval agreements are written documents entered into by two parties, one of which consents to the registration of a second party`s trademark to the United States Patent and Trademark Office („USPTO“). See our website Resolving Trademark Disputes Without Litigation, to better understand the options available to a trademark holder in the event of a dispute and the parties want to resolve the matter by mutual agreement without litigation. When an applicant refuses to register under section 2 (d) of the Trademark Act for reasons of confusion, a compliant notice agreement can be entered into and presented to overcome the refusal. Even if one party gives written consent to the other party registering a similar mark, the lawyer may continue to refuse the registration by mistake to the public. In addition, it is not likely that trademark holders will easily grant a leveraged approval agreement. It reveals differences in the respective brands, which mainly include differences between the brands themselves (appearance, sound/pronunciation, spelling, importance) and the products/services concerned. The reason for a detailed agreement is that entrepreneurs and value brand rights holders have no interest in confusing public opinion. Trademark holders will generally make efforts to protect their intellectual property rights and will only accept the registration of a similar trademark if they do not harm the company. DuPont believes that an approval agreement is another factor in the likelihood of a confusion analysis and may or may not tip the balance in favour of registration. All evidence must be verified and verified as part of a potential for confusion. The manual is published to provide USPTO trademark auditors, trademark candidates, lawyers and trademark representatives with a reference book on practices and procedures for pursuing trademark applications to the USPTO.
We cannot display this gallery